Inquires of Those Charged with Governance
This work program is used to document the results of certain inquiries of Those Charged with Governance (TCWG).
|
Who at the audited entity the inquiries were directed to: |
John Shedwick |
|
Who in the audit team performed the inquiries: |
Muhammad Afzal |
|
Date of the inquiries: |
27/03/2023 |
|
Inquiry |
TCWG response |
|
Fraud |
|
|
Their knowledge of any actual, suspected, or alleged fraud affecting the entity. |
Yes, an instance of a bank mandate fraud was identified whereby the fraudster managed to change the bank account details of an existing employee by obtaining a new starter form. LFRS processes were not followed and the department concerned has been contacted and reminded of the correct processes. One payment was made totalling £1,465.45. |
|
The risks of fraud in the entity, including those that are specific to the entity's business sector. |
No material risk identified as there is a reconciliation between the management accounts reported to Resources Committee and the financial accounts presented to Audit Committee. |
|
|
|
|
Litigation and Claims |
|
|
Whether they have any knowledge of potential litigation or claims affecting the entity |
The backdating of pensionable allowances may be subject to legal challenge citing Norman v Cheshire Fire and there may be a legal challenge relating to payments made to individuals when on annual leave citing the Bear v Fulton legal decision as the basis of their challenge . |